Criticism of NASA took aim at the wrong target
The Artemis I moon-bound rocket sits on Launch Complex 39B for a wet dress rehearsal test March 18 at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
Even though they aren't always correct, post editorials are typically well-reasoned and logically supported
The editorial titled "Deteriorating (space) relations," which was published on August 8 and called for improved planning for the ISS phaseout, was incorrect on both counts.
Subscribe to receive a weekly collection of debatable concepts.For many years, NASA has been preparing for the shutdown of the ISS.
Axiom Space has a contract for a personal space station. For a second space station that will serve private space companies and assist upcoming NASA missions
three aerospace groups, led by Northrop Grumman, Blue Origin, and Nanoracks/Lockheed Martin, are competing. This preparation exemplifies creativity and thoughtfulness.
The overbudget, protracted, and poorly planned Artemis moon landing programme, with its single-use, expendable Artemis launch vehicles that cost $1.5 billion each launch
the troubled Orion capsule, would have been a much more appropriate target.
discovering the reality beneath political hyperbole and evaluating statements to determine what is true and what is false.
be updated with technology updates
ARE YOU A TECHNOLOGY LOVER?